vendor riskcomplianceprocurement

Vendor Due Diligence for Awards Tech: Financial, Security and Compliance Red Flags

nnominee

2026-01-27

10 min read

Practical vendor due-diligence for awards tech: avoid shutdowns and protect voting integrity with a financial, security, and compliance checklist.

When your awards program depends on a vendor, what keeps you up at night?

Service shutdowns, surprise pivots, and opaque security postures cost organizations time, reputation, and money. In 2026 those risks are more visible than ever: BigBear.ai’s recent turnaround and acquisition of a FedRAMP-approved AI platform shows how a vendor can suddenly change risk profile, while Meta’s announced shutdown of Horizon Workrooms in February 2026 is a clear reminder that even the largest platform can stop selling or supporting a product with short notice.

The 2026 reality: why vendor due diligence matters now

Three trends in late 2025 and early 2026 make vendor due diligence mandatory for awards programs:

Consolidation and product pruning: large vendors continue to divest unprofitable lines or discontinue services that don’t fit a revised strategy. See risks of weaponized expirations and resale as an example of supply-chain style operational risk.
Heightened compliance expectations: FedRAMP and stronger privacy regimes are becoming table stakes for organizations accepting nominations and votes that include personal data.
Operational fragility: single points of failure and third-party dependencies (cloud, identity, payment processors) have led to faster, higher-impact outages.

These trends mean your awards tech vendor can be a strategic partner—or a catastrophic single point of failure. The rest of this article gives you a practical, prioritized checklist to assess financial health, service shutdown risk, security and compliance, and operational continuity. Use it as a working document for RFPs, contract negotiations, and ongoing vendor reviews.

Two short case studies: BigBear.ai and Meta (Workrooms)

Case study 1: BigBear.ai — turnaround with mixed signals (late 2025)

Reported in late 2025, BigBear.ai eliminated debt and acquired a FedRAMP-approved AI platform. This is a legitimate positive: a vendor with a FedRAMP asset signals strong cloud controls and suitability for government-related awards. But the same reporting flagged falling revenue and concentration risk in government contracts — meaning the business could remain high-risk despite improved compliance posture.

Lesson: regulatory accreditations (like FedRAMP) improve trust, but they do not replace a thorough financial and operational risk assessment.

Case study 2: Meta — unexpected product shutdown (January 2026)

In January 2026 Meta announced it would discontinue Horizon Workrooms and stop selling certain headsets and commercial services, effective February 2026. For teams that had started pilots or integrated these services, the shutdown required rapid migration planning and renegotiation of meeting/VR workflows.

Lesson: vendor size is not a guarantee of permanence. Your contract and contingency plans must assume any product can sunset with limited lead time.

Vendor due diligence checklist for awards programs

Below is a prioritized, actionable checklist. Use it during vendor selection and for annual reviews.

1. Financial health and business continuity

Request recent audited financial statements or at minimum a current consolidated income statement and balance sheet.
Ask for revenue trends (12/24/36 months), customer concentration (top 5 customers as % of revenue), and growth projections.
Check debt levels and liquidity: current ratio, burn rate, runway if private.
Identify ownership and M&A risk: private equity ownership, recent acquisitions, or restructuring history can signal a likelihood of product consolidation.
Red flags: declining revenue for 2+ consecutive quarters, >30% revenue concentration in top 1-2 clients, or undisclosed material liabilities.

2. Service stability and SLA scrutiny

Reliable SLAs are essential when collecting nominations and votes.

Request a copy of the standard SLA and any customer-specific SLA addenda.
Key SLA metrics: uptime % (monthly and annual), incident response time, resolution time, RTO/RPO for backups.
Ask about historical uptime and major incidents in the last 24 months, plus postmortems.
Negotiate financial remedies for missed SLAs and explicit termination rights if repeated SLA failures occur.
SLA red flags: vague uptime commitments, no financial remedy for downtime, or SLAs that exclude key components such as integrations or export APIs.

3. Security posture and certifications

For awards programs that manage voter personally identifiable information (PII) and voting integrity, security certifications and demonstrable controls matter.

Required evidence: SOC 2 Type II report, ISO 27001 certificate, and if you work with government data, FedRAMP authorization or authoritative controls mapping.
Confirm encryption standards: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest; key management policies; customer-managed keys if available.
Review identity controls: SSO/SAML support, MFA enforcement, least-privilege IAM, and separation of duties in admin roles — vendor adoption of modern auth stacks like MicroAuthJS can simplify enterprise SSO integrations.
Ask for results of recent third-party penetration tests and remediation timelines for any critical findings.
Red flags: refusal to share security reports under NDA, outdated certification dates, or inability to support SSO/MFA.

4. Compliance, privacy, and data residency

Confirm compliance with relevant privacy laws: GDPR, California CPRA, and any industry-specific requirements (e.g., HIPAA for health-related programs).
Ask where data is stored and processed (data centers, cloud region) and whether the vendor can support data residency requirements.
Require a Data Processing Addendum (DPA) that specifies subprocessor disclosures, deletion/return timelines, and breach notification obligations.
Check whether the vendor offers portability in common formats (CSV, JSON) for full nomination and voting data export.
Red flags: no DPA, no clear data residency options, or long/undefined data retention policies.

5. Voting integrity, auditability, and fairness

Your awards program’s credibility depends on demonstrable fairness. Evaluate the vendor’s technical and process controls that ensure tamper-resistant voting and transparent judging.

Require immutable audit logs with timestamps, event types, and actor IDs. Ask how logs are protected and for how long they are retained.
Look for cryptographic techniques: digital signatures, hash chains, or transparent logs to produce tamper-evident records — operational provenance work like trust-score design is directly relevant here.
Ask for third-party audit reports or independent verification of vote counts and judge scoring mechanisms.
Assess judge anonymity controls, ballot secrecy (if required), and measures to detect bots or ballot-stuffing (rate limits, CAPTCHA, device fingerprinting).
Red flags: opaque vote counting, lack of exportable vote trail, or vendor refusal to allow audits by third parties.

6. Third-party dependencies and supply chain risk

Map key sub-processors and cloud providers. Ask about contingency plans if a major dependency (e.g., a cloud provider or identity service) suffers prolonged outages; see notes on resilient edge backends for design patterns that improve resilience here.
Require the vendor to maintain a current list of subprocessors and provide 30-day notice for changes.
Evaluate vendor resilience to supply chain attacks and ask about secure build pipelines and software bill of materials (SBOM) practices.
Red flags: undisclosed or frequent subprocessor changes, reliance on a single-region cloud deployment without failover.

7. Exit and contingency planning

This is where Meta’s Workrooms shutdown should reshape your baseline expectations: demand explicit, tested exit provisions.

Contract clauses you must have: minimum notice before shutdown of service or product, data export in open formats, and termination assistance (migration support / runbook).
Negotiate a data escrow or export mechanism for critical configuration, templates, and nomination/vote data. Confirm frequency and testing of escrow restores — see migration and resilience practices in donation page and advocacy systems playbooks.
Require a documented Transition Plan that includes sample schedules for migration, resources the vendor will provide, and estimated costs if the vendor ends the service.
Test your export: perform an annual mock exit to ensure the export can be imported into a contingency system or new provider.
Red flags: no export API, export in proprietary formats only, or refusal to escrow critical configuration and code artifacts.

Practical tools: questionnaires, risk scorecard, and contract language

Vendor Due Diligence Questionnaire (VDQ) — key sections

Company & Financials: Last 3 years of revenue, top customers, cash runway, debt.
Product Stability: Roadmap, EOL policy, historical feature shutdowns.
Security & Compliance: Certifications, pen test summary, FedRAMP status if applicable.
Operational: SLA, uptime history, incident postmortems.
Data: Data residency, DPA terms, export formats, retention policy.
Voting integrity: Audit log specs, cryptographic measures, third-party audit evidence.
Exit: Notice period, data escrow, termination assistance, migration playbook.

Simple risk scorecard (1–5, 5 highest risk)

Financial health: 1 = healthy public company with growth, 5 = persistent losses and high debt
Service stability: 1 = 99.99% uptime + strong SLA, 5 = poor uptime or no SLA
Security/compliance: 1 = SOC2/ISO/FedRAMP, 5 = no audits
Data portability & exit: 1 = tested exports & escrow, 5 = no export/escrow
Voting integrity: 1 = cryptographic audit + third-party verification, 5 = opaque counting

Set a risk threshold: e.g., cumulative score above 12 requires mitigation before selection.

Sample contract language to request

"Vendor will provide no less than 90 days' written notice prior to discontinuation of the Service. In the event of service termination, Vendor will provide full export of Customer Data in machine-readable formats (CSV/JSON) within 15 business days, and provide reasonable termination assistance for a period of 90 days to facilitate migration. Critical configuration and templates will be placed in a Data Escrow and restored on Customer request if Vendor ceases operations."

Operational checklist for a migration-ready awards program

Inventory all data types the vendor stores: PII, ballots, audit logs, attachments, templates.
Set automated exports: schedule weekly snapshots of nominations/votes and monthly full backups to your cloud.
Build a minimal backup environment or partner capable of ingesting exported formats in 48–72 hours.
Document the integration touchpoints (SSO, webhooks, payment processors) and maintain API keys and secrets in your vault.
Run an annual 'sunset drill' to test the export, import, and public-facing continuity of an award cycle.

Red flags to watch for during procurement

Vendor refuses to sign a DPA or provide security reports even under NDA.
No exit or data escrow options.
Opaque or proprietary vote counting tools without independent validation.
Short or no SLA for incident response.
High customer concentration and frequent leadership turnover.

Putting it together: a sample vendor selection workflow

Send the VDQ and request SOC2/ISO/FedRAMP documents under NDA.
Score vendors with the risk scorecard and threshold rules.
Negotiate contract addenda: SLA with remedies, DPA, export formats, termination assistance.
Approve pilots only after escrow and export validation are in place.
Run an entry test: import a subset of historic nominations into a staging environment to validate integrity and workflows.

Actionable takeaways for awards program owners

Don’t let certifications substitute for financial and exit risk checks. BigBear.ai shows FedRAMP matters, but business fundamentals matter too.
Assume any product can be sunset quickly. Meta’s Workrooms shutdown proves even industry giants prune offerings.
Require auditable voting and exportable data. Treat audit logs and cryptographic proofs as core features, not optional add-ons. For provenance and tamper-evidence patterns, see work on operationalizing provenance and trust scores.
Test your exit plan annually. Mock migrations save weeks of crisis work during an actual shutdown.

2026 trends to build into your procurement playbook

Demand SBOMs and supply chain transparency as part of standard security reviews.
Expect increased regulatory checks around privacy and cross-border data transfers in 2026.
Negotiate for customer-managed encryption keys where possible to reduce third-party risk.
Insist on continuous compliance evidence (e.g., rolling SOC2 audits) rather than point-in-time certificates. Also consider deploying edge observability and continuous monitoring patterns used in high-availability infrastructures.

Final checklist: must-haves before you sign

Signed DPA and SLA with financial remedies
Export and data escrow plan validated by a test export
Security reports (SOC2 Type II or ISO 27001) and recent pen test results
Clear notice period for product shutdowns and documented termination assistance
Voting auditability: immutable logs and third-party verification option
Contingency budget and runbook for migration

Conclusion and next steps

Vendor due diligence in 2026 needs to be multi-dimensional: financial health, security and compliance, operational continuity, and voting integrity are equally important. BigBear.ai’s acquisition of a FedRAMP platform highlights the upside of improved compliance, while Meta’s rapid product exit shows the downside of relying on even major platforms without proper contractual and operational protections.

Make the checklist above your minimum viable vendor governance framework. Test exports, require audited controls, and negotiate exit protections proactively — then your awards program will be resilient to the unexpected. For additional patterns on observability and continuous compliance, review cloud-native observability notes and edge monitoring playbooks.

nominee

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.